Posts by Sam Scher
Why Geochemical Anomalies Fail: 10 Reasons Surface Signals Are Not Necessarily Drill Targets
Not every geochemical anomaly leads to a successful discovery. Many anomalies that appear compelling on maps ultimately fail when drilled, not because the geochemistry was wrong, but because the geological processes behind the data were misunderstood. From lithological background and regolith transport to analytical methods, sampling practices and statistical interpretation, numerous factors can create misleading exploration targets. This article explores the ten most common reasons geochemical anomalies fail and explains why understanding geological context is just as important as identifying anomalous values. Whether you’re working with legacy datasets, designing exploration programs or applying machine learning to geochemical data, this guide highlights the critical importance of interpreting processes rather than simply chasing anomalies. By integrating geology, geochemistry and sound data interpretation, exploration teams can improve drill targeting, reduce costly mistakes and make more informed exploration decisions.
Read MoreOrientation Surveys: A Question of Context, Not Convention
Exploring mineral deposits with confidence starts far before full-scale sampling efforts or large expenditures. For exploration teams, one of
Read MoreData Before Interpretation: Understanding Structure in Legacy Geochemical Datasets
Legacy geochemical datasets often contain hidden structural inconsistencies caused by mixed analytical methods, detection limits, and missing metadata. This blog explores why understanding data structure must come before interpretation and how a method-family approach can help restore comparability without distorting geological signal.
Read MoreCore Scanning in Exploration: Choosing the Right Tools for Mineralogical and Geochemical Insight
In mineral exploration and mining, precision and speed often define project success. Accurate alteration mapping is foundational to resource
Read More